[Consensus of infectious complications in patients treated with selected biological therapies: first Part]. / Consenso sobre riesgo de complicaciones infecciosas en pacientes usuarios de medicamentos biológicos seleccionados. Parte I.

The use of biological therapies has meant a great improvement in the management of several conditions like autoimmune, neoplastic or others diseases. Although its use has implied significant improvements in the prognosis of these diseases, it is not exempt from complications: infectious diseases as one of them. The objective of this consensus was to evaluate, from an infectious viewpoint, the safeness of the most frequently used biological therapies and give recommendations for the prevention of infections in patients treated with these drugs. These recommendations were based on the highest quality evidence available for the selected biologics. The consensus counts of two manuscripts. This first part details the risks of developing infectious complications depending on the type of biological used for a certain pathology. This evaluation included a broad search in MEDLINE and Epistemonikos of systematic reviews and meta-analyzes of controlled clinical trials and casecontrol examining post-treatment infections with anti-TNF alpha, anti-CD20, anti-CD52, CTLA4-Ig and anti-integrins. The research was complemented by a review of: multicentre cohorts of biological users, the MMWR of the CDC, Atlanta, U.S.A., and national registers and scientific societies in which infectious complications derived from the use of biological therapies were mentioned.

Consenso sobre riesgo de complicaciones infecciosas en pacientes usuarios de medicamentos biológicos seleccionados. Parte I / Consensus of infectious complications in patients treated with selected biological therapies: first Part

Resumen La incorporación de terapias biológicas ha significado un gran avance en el manejo de diversas patologías de origen autoinmune, neoplásico u otros. Si bien su uso ha implicado mejoras significativas en el pronóstico de estas enfermedades, no está exento de complicaciones, entre estas, las infecciosas. El objetivo de este consenso fue evaluar el perfil de seguridad, desde la mirada infectológica, de las terapias biológicas de uso más frecuente y dar recomendaciones para la prevención de infecciones en pacientes tratados con ellas, basándose en la evidencia de mayor calidad disponible para los biológicos seleccionados. El consenso cuenta de dos manuscritos. Esta primera parte detalla los riesgos de desarrollar complicaciones infecciosas dependiendo del tipo de biológico utilizado para determinada patología. La revisión incluyó búsqueda amplia en MEDLINE y Epistemonikos de revisiones sistemáticas y meta-análisis de estudios clínicos controlados y caso/control que examinaban infecciones posteriores al tratamiento con anti-TNF alfa, anti-CD20, anti-CD52, CTLA4-Ig y anti-integrinas. Esta búsqueda se complementó con revisión de cohortes multicéntricas de usuarios de biológicos, del MMWR del CDC, Atlanta, E.U.A. y de registros nacionales y/o de sociedades científicas en la que se hiciera mención a complicaciones infecciosas derivadas del uso de biológicos.

The use of biological therapies has meant a great improvement in the management of several conditions like autoimmune, neoplastic or others diseases. Although its use has implied significant improvements in the prognosis of these diseases, it is not exempt from complications: infectious diseases as one of them. The objective of this consensus was to evaluate, from an infectious viewpoint, the safeness of the most frequently used biological therapies and give recommendations for the prevention of infections in patients treated with these drugs. These recommendations were based on the highest quality evidence available for the selected biologics. The consensus counts of two manuscripts. This first part details the risks of developing infectious complications depending on the type of biological used for a certain pathology. This evaluation included a broad search in MEDLINE and Epistemonikos of systematic reviews and meta-analyzes of controlled clinical trials and casecontrol examining post-treatment infections with anti-TNF alpha, anti-CD20, anti-CD52, CTLA4-Ig and anti-integrins. The research was complemented by a review of: multicentre cohorts of biological users, the MMWR of the CDC, Atlanta, U.S.A., and national registers and scientific societies in which infectious complications derived from the use of biological therapies were mentioned.

Incidencia de bacterias multi-resistentes en unidades de cuidados intensivos de hospitales chilenos / Incidence of multi-resistant bacteria in Intensive Care Units of Chilean hospitals

Resumen Introducción: La vigilancia de incidencia de bacterias multi-resistentes es un indicador que permite estimar mejor la magnitud de la resistencia bacteriana en los servicios hospitalarios. Objetivo: Evaluar la incidencia de bacterias multi-resistentes relevantes en unidades de cuidados intensivos del país y establecer las diferencias entre población adulta y pediátrica. Metodología: Se solicitó a los hospitales participantes información del número de aislados de siete bacterias multi-resistentes epidemiológicamente relevantes de unidades de cuidados intensivos (UCI) de adulto y pediátrico entre enero de 2014 y octubre de 2015, y el número de días-cama ocupados en dichas unidades en el mismo período. Con estos datos se calculó incidencia por 1.000 pacientes-día para cada unidad. Resultados: Se recibió información de 20 UCI adultos y 9 UCI pediátricas. En UCI adultos las bacterias de mayor incidencia fueron K. pneumoniae productora de BLEE [4,72 × 1.000 días cama (1,21-13,89)] y S. aureus resistente a oxacilina [3,85 (0,71-12,66)]. En pediatría la incidencia fue menor, destacando K. pneumoniae productora de BLEE [2,71 (0-7,11)] y P. aeruginosa resistente a carbapenémicos [1,61 (0,31-9,25)]. Conclusión: Se observan importantes diferencias entre los distintos hospitales en la incidencia de las bacterias estudiadas. La incidencia de bacterias multi-resistentes en UCI de adultos es significativamente mayor que en UCI pediátrica para la mayoría de las bacterias estudiadas.

Introduction: Incidence of multi-resistant bacteria is an indicator that permits better estimation of the magnitude of bacterial resistance in hospitals. Aim: To evaluate the incidence of relevant multi-drug resistant bacteria in intensive care units (ICUs) of Chile. Methods: Participating hospitals submitted information about the number of isolates from infected or colonized patients with 7 epidemiologically relevant multi-resistant bacteria in adult and pediatric ICUs between January 1, 2014 and October 31, 2015 and the number of bed days occupied in these units in the same period was requested. With these data incidence was calculated per 1,000 patient days for each unit. Results: Information from 20 adults and 9 pediatric ICUs was reviewed. In adult ICUs the bacteria with the highest incidence were K. pneumoniae ESBL [4.72 × 1,000 patient day (1.21-13.89)] and oxacillin -resistant S. aureus [3.85 (0.71-12.66)]. In the pediatric units the incidence was lower, highlighting K. pneumoniae ESBL [2.71 (0-7.11)] and carbapenem -resistant P. aeruginosa [1.61 (0.31-9.25)]. Conclusion: Important differences between hospitals in the incidence of these bacteria were observed. Incidence of multi-resistant bacteria in adult ICU was significantly higher than in pediatric ICU for most of the studied bacterias.

[Incidence of multi-resistant bacteria in Intensive Care Units of Chilean hospitals]. / Incidencia de bacterias multi-resistentes en unidades de cuidados intensivos de hospitales chilenos.

INTRODUCTION: Incidence of multi-resistant bacteria is an indicator that permits better estimation of the magnitude of bacterial resistance in hospitals. AIM: To evaluate the incidence of relevant multi-drug resistant bacteria in intensive care units (ICUs) of Chile. METHODS: Participating hospitals submitted information about the number of isolates from infected or colonized patients with 7 epidemiologically relevant multi-resistant bacteria in adult and pediatric ICUs between January 1, 2014 and October 31, 2015 and the number of bed days occupied in these units in the same period was requested. With these data incidence was calculated per 1,000 patient days for each unit. RESULTS: Information from 20 adults and 9 pediatric ICUs was reviewed. In adult ICUs the bacteria with the highest incidence were K. pneumoniae ESBL [4.72 × 1,000 patient day (1.21-13.89)] and oxacillin -resistant S. aureus [3.85 (0.71-12.66)]. In the pediatric units the incidence was lower, highlighting K. pneumoniae ESBL [2.71 (0-7.11)] and carbapenem -resistant P. aeruginosa [1.61 (0.31-9.25)]. CONCLUSION: Important differences between hospitals in the incidence of these bacteria were observed. Incidence of multi-resistant bacteria in adult ICU was significantly higher than in pediatric ICU for most of the studied bacterias.